Governance
Governance, ethics and accountability.
We operate under a documented institutional framework with clear separation between strategic direction and execution, conflict of interest policy, safeguarding and public traceability of funds.
How we are organised
Legal structure: pending public confirmation.
Donation-receiving entity: pending public confirmation.
HQ country: pending public confirmation.
Countries of operation: United States, Spain and Venezuela.
The platform operates with institutional strategic direction, transversal curatorial coordination and local teams at each territorial node. The institutional platform defines framework, criteria, governance and reporting; nodes execute, measure and document.
This architecture avoids duplication of functions and allows each territorial subdomain to preserve operational autonomy within a shared institutional framework.
Leadership
The leadership structure should be published once roles are confirmed and authorised for public communication.
- General director: pending public confirmation.
- Curatorial director: pending public confirmation.
- Programmes director: pending public confirmation.
- Impact and reporting director: pending public confirmation.
- Partnerships and philanthropy director: pending public confirmation.
Full profiles will be published as the institutional team is confirmed.
Advisory council
A group of figures from the cultural, academic, philanthropic and corporate worlds accompanies the strategic direction of the platform. The council has no executive responsibility, but its criteria inform institutional, ethical and strategic decisions.
Advisory Board composition should only be published when explicit authorisation has been received from each member.
Advisory Board composition pending public confirmation.
Public documentation
We publish key institutional documents in accessible format. Each document should include update date, version and institutional authorship.
Until official documents are approved and uploaded to the server, links should point to prepared routes inside /assets/documents/.
Institutional ethics framework
We maintain explicit policies on conflict of interest, fund acceptance, participant protection, responsible use of imagery, community rights, safeguarding and partner relations.
These policies should be reviewed at least once a year and published in their current version once formally approved.
- Conflict of interest. Identification and management of relationships that may compromise institutional decisions.
- Fund acceptance. Criteria to evaluate the ethical, reputational and strategic compatibility of donors or partners.
- Safeguarding. Protection of participants, especially minors and people in vulnerable situations.
- Use of imagery. Informed consent and protection of dignity, privacy and context.
- Curatorial independence. Protection of artistic, educational and community decisions from external pressure.
How we respond to partners and communities
Accountability is not limited to publishing positive results. It includes methodological limitations, learnings, corrections, process documentation and explanation of how resources are used.
Each territorial programme should generate local evidence. The institutional platform consolidates the global reading and publishes aggregated learnings.
See reports and documentsInstitutional trust is built with evidence.
Our governance is designed to sustain cultural impact, protect communities and provide traceability for partners, participants and publics.