Best interests of minors
Any decision involving minors must prioritize their safety, dignity, development and rights.
Framework page · version 1.0 · last editorial update: May 2026
This page presents the institutional structure of the Exodus & Resilience Safeguarding Policy. Its definitive content will be published when the corresponding governance documents are validated, dated and signed.
This page remains accessible exclusively for institutional transparency purposes and does not represent an approved public-use document.
If you need a definitive, signed and dated version for institutional due diligence, you may request it at contacto@exodusandresilience.org.
The Safeguarding Policy defines the principles and practices that guide the protection of participants, communities, teams and collaborators across Exodus & Resilience programs.
It establishes a public reference for prevention, informed consent, responsible use of image, incident reporting and proportionate response while the platform consolidates its formal governance structure.
Safeguarding is not an accessory component. It is a structural condition of cultural, educational, curatorial and community work.
Exodus & Resilience works with communities, artists and participants who may be situated in contexts of fragility: migration processes, unequal access, sensitive memory, identity tensions, public exposure or social fragmentation.
The platform assumes responsibility for preventing risks, acting with institutional care and responding in a documented manner to situations that may compromise the dignity, safety or rights of participants.
This policy applies proportionately during the founding phase and will be updated as each territorial node enters implementation and local operational conditions are formalized.
This Policy applies to activities, programs, physical spaces, digital environments, archives and public materials operated by Exodus & Resilience or by its territorial nodes once activated.
The policy also serves as a reference for future agreements with host entities, implementing partners, fiscal sponsors, donors, contractors and collaborators.
Any decision involving minors must prioritize their safety, dignity, development and rights.
Adults, especially those in vulnerable situations, must be treated with respect for their autonomy, context and rights.
Participation, recording and public dissemination must be based on informed consent where applicable.
Image, testimony and personal data must be used with clear purpose, limited scope and institutional care.
The platform must actively prevent abuse, harassment, exploitation, coercion or inappropriate treatment.
Any safeguarding concern should receive a proportionate, documented and rights-based response.
The institutional framework foresees specific criteria for activities involving minors and people in vulnerable situations.
When activities involve schools, community organizations, museums, universities or partner spaces, safeguarding responsibilities must be coordinated with the applicable local rules and institutional protocols.
People connected to Exodus & Resilience commit to maintaining professional, respectful and prudent conduct at all times.
Participation, audiovisual recording, use of image and public dissemination of testimonies are based on informed consent, in written form whenever operationally possible.
Exodus & Resilience avoids instrumental use of personal stories, testimonies or images of communities connected to migration, sensitive memory or social vulnerability.
Safeguarding applies to digital environments as much as to physical activities. Websites, social media, newsletters, audiovisual archives, research materials and public reports must respect consent, context and proportionality.
Exodus & Resilience foresees a safeguarding incident reporting channel accessible to participants, team members, partners and third parties. Until segmented inboxes and formal reporting structures are active, safeguarding concerns may be communicated through the institutional contact channel.
Safeguarding concerns may be sent to contacto@exodusandresilience.org. Until segmented inboxes are active, all safeguarding, ethics, governance, privacy, press, partnership and institutional requests are managed through this single email address.
In the event of confirmed breaches, Exodus & Resilience may apply proportionate measures according to the seriousness of the case, the role of the person involved, the available evidence and the protection needs of affected persons.
The guiding criterion is the protection of the affected person, prevention of further harm and institutional integrity.
Safeguarding procedures will be adapted to the legal, cultural and institutional context of each territorial node once it enters implementation.
Executed through a formalized institutional alliance with VAEA. Safeguarding measures should align with the requirements of the host entity and applicable local standards.
Program in design. Local safeguarding procedures will be defined with accredited local cultural or educational partners when the node is activated.
Program in design. Safeguarding criteria will pay particular attention to sensitive memory, public exposure and local community conditions.
Executed through a formalized institutional alliance with the Fundación Museo de Arte Acarigua-Araure. Local implementation should coordinate with the implementing entity’s institutional context.
The Fundación Museo de Arte Acarigua-Araure is mentioned in text only. Its logo must not be used in public materials until formal brand-use authorization has been granted.
This Policy should be updated as the platform’s governance structure, territorial programs, partner agreements, legal requirements and operational practices evolve.
Review should be triggered by governance milestones, activation of new territorial programs, partner requirements, significant operational changes, incidents, legal updates or documented learning.
Each definitive review will be documented and published on the institutional platform with its updated version when approved.
Framework page · version 1.0 · last editorial update: May 2026.
Public trust depends on a responsible cultural practice that is documented, proportionate and attentive to the real risks of each context.